2012 Ford Ranger Spied With Details

Ford plans a brand new, small pickups produced globally for the year 2012. As for the name, we are not sure whether it will carry the name Ranger, or use the F-100 title.

Future 2012 Ford Ranger in 2012, looks a little bigger than the current Ford Ranger sold in the U.S., which is not, available in four-door crew cab configuration. Ford also confirmed the death Exlorer Sport-Trac four-door model, which might perhaps open the door for the four-door Ranger.

Technique ass looks in this picture may look like a facelifted, two versions of the cab Mazda BT-50′s, AOS sold outside the U.S., which shares a common platform with the Thai-built 2012 Ford Ranger abroad. However, in the sources said they recorded and rocky hide the body and mechanicals Ford running gear, AOS generation global small pickup. New pickup is likely to mean that all Ford Ranger models will be built on a global platform, alled T6. Current foreign shares only its name with the 2012  Ford Ranger Ranger built for North America.

This step is expected to mirror the Ford, AOS latest product strategy to cut costs by designing a new vehicle at a global platform.

T6 test truck saw configured on both the left and right drive version, and longer and wider than the current overseas Ranger. The test mule we photographed supported by diesel and gas engines. An industry source said the T6 Ranger for the U.S. likely will be activated by a new 1.6-liter four-cylinder turbocharged direct injection EcoBoost engine produces at least 175 horsepower and 180 pound-feet of torque. Ford, AOS 3.0-liter Duratorq TDCi four-cylinder turbodiesel engine, rated 154 horsepower and 280 pound-feet of torque, is expected to be brought into the new trucks for buyers outside the U.S.

It should be noted, however, that Ford has stated that they did not intend to bring the global Ranger to the U.S. market after they were killed from the aging Ranger U.S. market next year. Some speculated that the expense of the Ford F-150 sales would cost more than what they would lose only by not offering a smaller supply.

Source: leftlanenews.com